Unfair Dismissal Over 'Nazi' Claim Costs Rail Firm £70k

A railway signaller, Michael Knox has been awarded £70,000 for unfair dismissal after being accused of calling a cleaner a “Nazi food thrower” for clearing out the office fridge.

The accusation arose after Knox found some of his food on the kitchen counter and allegedly made the offensive remark to cleaner Bogamil Jacek Plaszcyca.

Knox, who was employed by Network Rail, was then dismissed for gross misconduct following the incident.

Tribunal Judgment

The tribunal heard that the cleaning agency’s policy of discarding unnamed and undated food from the fridge every Friday had caused ongoing friction among staff. The agency’s policy was intended to maintain hygiene but had been a source of tension among staff for some time.

Knox admitted to expressing frustration about the policy but denied making any offensive comments directly to the cleaner. The tribunal ruled that there was insufficient evidence to confirm the exact words used by Knox.

Following his dismissal, members of the RMT trade union, of which Knox was a representative, voted for strike action. RMT general secretary Mick Lynch requested a review of the decision, but this was rejected.

The employment tribunal in Reading found that while Knox had been “loud” and at the centre of a “ruckus and commotion,” it could not be certain what was actually said. The panel concluded that any inappropriate words were likely directed at colleagues rather than the cleaner.

The tribunal therefore awarded Knox £8,700 for breach of contract, £15,500 as a basic award and £52,000 in compensation for unfair dismissal.

Commentary

This case underscores the critical importance of conducting thorough investigations and ensuring fair disciplinary procedures in the workplace. When allegations of misconduct arise, it is essential for employers to undertake a comprehensive and impartial investigation. This involves gathering all relevant evidence, interviewing witnesses and providing the accused employee with an opportunity to present their side. A well-conducted investigation helps to establish the facts and ensures that any disciplinary action taken is based on solid evidence rather than assumptions or hearsay.

Employers must ensure that allegations of misconduct are substantiated with clear and convincing evidence before taking drastic actions such as dismissal. This means that the evidence should be robust enough to support the conclusion that the employee committed the alleged misconduct. Inadequate investigations or decisions based on insufficient evidence can lead to claims of unfair dismissal such as this case.

The substantial compensation awarded in this case reflects the tribunal’s recognition of the significant impact that unfair dismissal can have on employees. Unfair dismissal can lead to financial hardship, emotional distress and damage to an employee's professional reputation. It can also affect the morale and trust of remaining employees, who may feel insecure about their own job stability.

Call a specialist employment lawyer  

Magara Law is an employment law firm in Bicester, Banbury, Reading and Paddington, London, and services clients nationwide. 

For more information or to contact our employment law team at Magara Law, call 01869 325 883 or email roy@magaralaw.co.uk.